The Nuremberg Hearing & MiniSeries
Follow the groundbreaking Nuremberg Hearing Initiative in our new miniseries exposing "The Greatest Medical Crime in History: How We Take Back Our Freedom".
The Road to Nuremberg 2.0 is starting March 31, 2025. Join us.

01:38

Nuremberg Hearing-Sue The WHO Explainer W/ IoJ, Dr Yeadon, Sasha Latypova, Dr. Janci Lindsay,

Costa Rica Ministry of Health WHO Pandemic & Covid Science Inquiry
Key Concerns Raised
The hearing addressed WHO Emergency Use Listings, PCR testing reliability, vaccine safety issues, and manufacturing practices that potentially violated ethical standards.
International Standards
Costa Rica confirmed that the country has fully withdrawn from pandemic treaty discussions and is declining WHO invitations following ministerial instructions.
Legal Implications
Violations of human rights treaties and constitutional law are nullifying ethics and Nuremberg Code through legal waivers, lack of proper oversight and transparency in approval processes.
Article 3 Nuremberg Code Violations
Former health minister Daniel Salas testified that Costa Rica couldn't find any records of animal studies in IoJ's previous case, a clear violation of Nuremberg 3! Seeking justice and upholding the Nuremberg Code of ethics is our goal.
Expert Panel Nuremberg Hearing Participants
Industry & Pharma Experts
Mike Yeadon (former pharmaceutical executive) and Sasha Latypova (pharmaceutical R&D executive) provided critical insights on the covid vaccine failing to meet industry safety or manufacturing practices.
Scientific Expert Authorities
Dr. Leicia Martin (nanoscientist) and Dr. Janci Lindsay (toxicologist) presented evidence on biological concerns, safety issues regarding potential genome integration and why PCR testing for an emergency is unscientific & fraudulent.
Legal Representatives
Jorge Montero (lawyer) and Interest of Justice representatives Dustin Bryce & Lady Xylie, civil society representatives aggressively advocated for accountability and transparency in a lengthy list of demands and requests.
WHO Emergency Use Listings Concerns

Public Health Risk
Potential jeopardy to public health

Fraudulent Approvals
Claims of inadequate verification

Manufacturing Practices
Non-compliance with standards

Lack of Oversight
Fundamental transparency issues
Participants expressed deep concern that the Costa Rica Comptroller Office may have been defrauded and that products failed to meet ethical standards and legal vaccine definitions.
PCR Testing Reliability Issues
Invalid Diagnostic Tool
FDA and WHO documentation acknowledges limitations

No Standardized Values
Lab-to-lab variations in results

Unreliable Primers
Cross-reactivity with other species

Extended Positivity
Remains positive months after infection

Vaccine Safety and Manufacturing Concerns
Gene Therapy Classification
Not traditional vaccines but gene therapies
2
Genomic Integration
Evidence from studies on various cell types
Lipid Nanoparticle Issues
Accumulation in reproductive organs
Rushed Development
Inadequate timeline for safety evaluation
Requested Actions and Next Steps

Immediate Suspension
Halt reliance on WHO EUL products

Decree Nullification
Annul emergency decrees lacking scientific validation

Commission Creation
Establish science policy interface for oversight
Additional requests include compensation for victims of regulatory failures and release of vaccine injury data for proper analysis. The Presidents Office and Health Ministry are scheduled to issue a decision soon.
Follow Our Miniseries Journey
Join our Saturday noon EST meetups at community.interestofjustice.org where we discuss all steps we're taking to restore informed consent and ethics. Follow our social media channels, subscribe to our newsletter, and watch our weekly livestreams for the latest updates on this groundbreaking investigation.